Those in favor of the death penalty argue that people who commit gruesome crimes deserve to be executed for them. The death penalty is a cruel and uncivilized way of keeping crime down to a minimum, by killing anyone who commits a horrible crime such as murder. The below represents a death penalty pros and cons essay, which neither approves nor disapproves capital punishment but rather gives readers a chance to decide for themselves. Death penalty is wasting their own time for killing people. Violent crimes such a murder, rape, sexual assault, and robbery are perpetrated by criminals once every few minutes in this country.
If not abolished, what kind of crimes are deserving of the death penalty? If this person was given the death penalty, then tragically an innocent life has been lost. Is there a chance that the accused is innocent? The criminal justice system is not a place where decisions are meant to be based on passion. It would be a wanton cruelty. There are many cases whereby individuals are imprisoned and 1192 Words 5 Pages No Death Penalty Capital crime is something that is meant for people that are found guilty of committing a serious crime, such as murder, rape, or theft. They represent a group that is highly unlikely to make rational decisions based on a fear of future consequences for their actions.
It has also occurred before that the death penalty has made false accusations killing innocent people. Saleh-Hanna, a contributer to the book 'The Case for Penal Abolition' has recently done some research and found that,? A lot of people become victims of such wrongful execution and this leads to the loss of trust and faith towards justice and legal authorities among the citizens. However, in the recently years, people pay more attention in the human rights. A citizen 's job would consist of executing Americans, for a capital crime, that they may, or may have not committed. In practice the death penalty was never applied as widely as the law provided, as a variety of procedures were adopted to decrease the harshness of the law.
Looking for an essay related to Death Penalty Essay? The death penalty is an endangerment to anybody that wants to make good use of their life and must be abrogated as soon as possible. Criminals who are rich can buy their way out of their punishment Stevenson, 2004. However, there are several documented cases of prisoners being released years after imprisonment. The death penalty is unjust and morally wrong. The death penalty happens to give America a painful image to the community and is making America a selfish country. This makes them just as guilty as the person who committed the crime: the only difference is that they didn't use weapon except their mouth to kill them. People don't realize that they are putting the blood of another person life on their hands.
The question now is, is that logical? Abolishing the death penalty is moral and could prevent innocent lives of being wrongfully convicted but it could also allow vicious and heinous criminals to continue to pose a threat to people. I agree that life is a valuable present which God gives us. This is cause for speculation which cannot be ignored. Close to death: Reflections on race and capital punishment in America. If more people read about the death penalty, and find out that it is the best form of justice, then they may also support it. Our taxes are spending way too much on these useless scum that does more harm then good. There are mixed reactions on capital punishment 1443 Words 6 Pages 6 Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished in the United States? However, only eighteen out of the fifty states have abolished the death penalty.
This is much more than a hypothetical. The death penalty takes focus away from the victims and focuses the attention on the criminal. The debate is over one of the most grueling punishments to be ever held for criminals for quite a while- the death penalty. In my view, I am not in favor of death penalty, as I strongly believe that, death penalty is unacceptable and an inhumane practice for it denies one the right to live. Personally, I agree death penalty could continue to use in China only with tight monitoring of each capital cases including whether the charges of delinquent is deserved to die or whether the execution method is too inhumane. Apparently the decease punishment is one sort of warning penalty.
Death penalty sends a bad message to the society. Murdering a person, without no doubt, is the worst crime a person can commit. The jury is also a factor in determining penalty. Further, the death penalty cannot be taken back once it is executed. Particularly we can salvage society resource. It is because of this that support of the death penalty can be deemed as moral hypocrisy.
In Guatemala we've had only two ways of death penalty, execution and lethal injection. This shows China does not respect Human Rights or only in a small degree of appreciation. However, if we are to agree that taking the life of another human being can be categorized as the upmost heinous of acts, how can we justify treating such a crime with a punishment that mirrors the very thing we so adamantly condemn? Berkeley School of Law, , a litany of doctors have participated in executions for the past three decades with little to no reproach. There are many options such as, life without parole. Also, it shows the hand of justice to the worst criminals, like terrorists. Or is it right to let violent criminals who take innocent lives live? All the morons in prison are useless to society anyway, yet they seem to get better treatment than hardworking honest people. When the cry of the heart rate monitor becomes monotone, the corrupt procedure is complete.